Login
Register
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Users
Ask a Question
Tips
Sawtooth Software Home
Most popular tags
cbc
lighthouse-9
acbc
ssi-web
ssi-web-8
maxdiff
cbc-hb
javascript
grid-question
constructed-list
unverified-perl
ssi-web-7
free-format
skip-logic
alternative-specific-design
willingness-to-pay
select-question
choice-simulator
cbc-latent-class
quota-control
acbc-hb
mbc
conditional-pricing
smrt
pass-in-fields
Have an idea?
Visit
Sawtooth Software Feedback
to share your ideas on how we can improve our products.
MaxDiff RLH with 9 sets of 6 items each and each item shown 3 times
We ran a MaxDiff with 18 items. We used 9 sets of 6 items each and with each item seen 3 times. N=150.
The RLH is running from .17 to .58. What should the minimum RLH be to for good respondents?
Thank you!
maxdiff
asked
Jul 28, 2021
by
anonymous
Your comment on this question:
Your name to display (optional):
Email me at this address if a comment is added after mine:
Email me if a comment is added after mine
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
[captcha placeholder]
To avoid this verification in future, please
log in
or
register
.
Your solution to the original question
Please only use this to answer the original question. Otherwise please use comments.
Your name to display (optional):
Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on:
Email me if my answer is selected or commented on
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
To avoid this verification in future, please
log in
or
register
.
1 Answer
0
votes
Here's the initial paper on the topic which provides your answer:
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/identifying-consistency-cutoffs-identify-bad-respondents-orme/?trackingId=g9ylG8GeasHXn79cZcC5JQ%3D%3D
And here's a recent update:
https://sawtoothsoftware.com/resources/technical-papers/diagnostics-for-random-respondents-in-choice-experiments
answered
Jul 28, 2021
by
Keith Chrzan
Platinum
(
111,275
points)
Thank you. Based on the numbers I shared, is an RLH of .17 too low?
Probably, yes. It's essentially the fit you'd expect from random responders (6 items/set you'd guess random data correctly 1/6 = 16.667% of the time).
Your comment on this answer:
Your name to display (optional):
Email me at this address if a comment is added after mine:
Email me if a comment is added after mine
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
[captcha placeholder]
To avoid this verification in future, please
log in
or
register
.
...