Most popular tags

cbc lighthouse-9 ssi-web ssi-web-8 maxdiff acbc cbc-hb javascript grid-question constructed-list ssi-web-7 free-format unverified-perl skip-logic alternative-specific-design latent-class acbc-summed-price select-question smrt mbc quota-control willingness-to-pay choice-simulator conditional-pricing attribute-interactions

Have an idea?

Visit Sawtooth Software Feedback to share your ideas on how we can improve our products.

Count report, Must to Have, Unacceptable

I am carrying a ACBC analysis using Sawtooth.

I would like to clarify whether my understanding is correct about Must to Have and Unacceptable.
As far as I understand, not all respondents will have to inform on this, as these questions 'pop up' in case Sawtooth detects some consistent pattern in the responses and probe the informants to confirm whether the levels detected are truly Must to have or Unacceptable from the perspective of the respondent.
Is my understanding correct ?
Does this explain why the base sample does not have necessarily the size of the sample of respondents ?
Is there any best practice to analyze and report Must to Have and Unacceptable ?
many thanks in advance for your feedbacks,

best regards
asked Sep 29, 2016 by anonymous
retagged Jun 19, 2017 by Walter Williams

Your solution to the original question

Please only use this to answer the original question. Otherwise please use comments.
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:

To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.
Powered by Question2Answer
...